eimarra: (Default)
I spent a good portion of Sunday wandering, looking at the art (Whelan and Picacio covers in all their original glory!), and buying gifts for my family. Oh, and letting my brain digest what it had already taken in. So this post is going to be somewhat light on actual events. I suppose I should have gone to the 11 a.m. talk, "SF/F/H Sites to See (Before You Die): E Publishing and Online Media," with Scott Andrews (Beneath Ceaseless Skies), Neil Clarke (Clarkesworld Magazine among other things), and James Patrick Kelly, but I didn't.

The 10 a.m. panel, "25 Things I learned from Science Fiction," was a lot of fun. Panelists included Lawrence Schoen ([livejournal.com profile] klingonguy), Ginjer Buchanan, Steven H. Silver, Michael Flynn, and Neil Clarke [livejournal.com profile] clarkesworld). Neil Clarke came prepared with a list of 25 things; the others came prepared with quips, general knowledge, and the punchiness that arises at that hour on the Sunday morning of a con. Ginjer Buchanan gave a concise discussion of didactic novels and why we expect to learn anything from SF or other books. Things people said they learned included, on the not-so-serious side, that aliens were vulnerable to Earth bacteria and viruses and that it's not science fiction unless there's a space princess. On the more serious side, [livejournal.com profile] klingonguy learned how to make a vacuum tube, Alfred Bester taught such things as pheromones and earworms, and various card games from cribbage to chemin de fer have been explained in books.

The next panel I went to was "Believable Relationships," with Beth Bernobich, Lois McMaster Bujold, Darlene Marshall, Jo Walton, and Geary Gravel. It started off with discussing why so many people in books in are orphans with no ties and went on to discuss how to make relationships believable if they're not mirroring your own relationships (I, for example, do not have a sister, so how do I write sister-sister interactions?), differences between SF and fantasy (fantasy tends to have much larger family relationships, Beth Bernobich said -- though Lois McMaster Bujold's Miles Vorkosigian books certainly have a wide range!), how one does research, why so many women read M/M sex stories, what relationships the panelists enjoy most when reading books, and relationships as motivation. A couple of the things said in this talk helped me fill in a blank spot in my outline for Sundered Sword, and it's going to be stronger for it, I think.

The final panel discussion I attended was "Are Good and Evil Gone from Epic Fantasy?" The moderator, David Anthony Durham, was hoping that the panel could come to a yes or no answer by the end of the talk. Panelists, including Beth Bernobich, Greer Gilman, and Patrick Nielsen Hayden, weren't so sure. They discussed what worked about good and evil. PNH made the observation that even Tolkien wasn't about good and evil, but about the high cost of good. Other panelists agreed, discussing shadings of good and evil and nobility and change through his work. ([livejournal.com profile] bonniers pointed out that Sam does function as a purely good character.) Topics ranged from the seductiveness of evil to accommodation to characters with alien motivations to whether books for children and teens should have black & white morality. At one point, evil was discussed as equivalent to a disaster in a disaster movie -- a volcano or iceberg, without motivations, just a plot driver for the characters to work their more human stories out around. At the end of the panel, David Anthony Durham asked each panelist whether good and evil are gone. Beth Bernobich: "Still exists, but the preponderance has shifted." Greer Gilman: "It's not gone, and the bad guys still have all the best clothes." PNH: "I think there's still spaghetti and meatballs *and* chocolate mint." (That did make sense in context, really.)

Overall, it was a terrific con with a great mix of panels. It would've been fabulous if I could have gotten to more talks, but I'm sure my brain would feel even more full than it does already. I highly recommend going next year if you can make it.
eimarra: (Default)
I started off the day by going to a panel on the works of Vernor Vinge (the Hal Clement Science Speaker), which was essentially a Q&A by the other panelists -- a sort of cruel thing to do to someone at 10 in the morning, perhaps, with parties on Friday night, but it was very informative. One of the questions, of course, was "What is the Singularity?" His response included a quote from one of his stories: "This is a different sort of arm's race we're in." He also made the point that it's hard to write a sudden high impact of technology, that it can't be realistic because it's chatted up years, even decades before it's widespread.

Next up was "Technology of T/o/d/a/y/ Tomorrow," with Charlie Stross, Edie Stern, and John Cohn. This was a high-science talk, where everything was discussed from the pros and cons of smartphones (decreased time in office & increased time on street for cops who can make reports remotely, increased stress from executives who feel they're never away from the office), the feeling of withdrawal being away from the Internet (John Cohn was on a reality TV show where everyone reported phantom vibrator cellphone rings during the time of filming), the decreased cultivation of personal memory, and the low cost of DNA sequencing. And some other stuff besides, such as whether we ever will be "jacked in" to the Net.

I went to the literary beer with David Hartwell. It was fascinating: large periods of listening to him talk with Michael Swanwick about Swanwick's new book and about a memoir being worked on by Murray Leinster's daughter. There was also some discussion of unreliable narrators (with the recommendation to read Pale Fire by Nabokov) and of Gene Wolfe's new book -- which evidently ends with a highly crafted bit of unreliable narrator.

The panel on the city, with James Patrick Kelly, Steven H. Silver, Patrick Neilsen Hayden, Alexander Jablokov, and S.C. Butler, provided some prods to my muse (and what doesn't?), but a lot of what was discussed seemed to relate to New York City, despite some attempts to mention cities elsewhere in the country and the world, from African cities to Rome's continued presence, despite periods of expansion and contraction during history. One of the points made was that in science fiction, the cities always feel as if they are constructed whole and entire, as arcologies, rather than growing organically, as real cities do. Fantasy stories do a much better job of representing that organic feel. Also, generally, cities play larger roles in novels than in short stories, because a short story can't really explore very many aspects of a city. (Though Metatropolis was used as an example that it can be done, and done well, with short stories.) James Patrick Kelly also commented that science-fiction writers are not particularly good economists: "Where does the money come from to do these things?"

The "Is Fantasy Displacing Science Fiction?" panel featured David Hartwell, F. Brett Cox, Mary Kay Kare, and Justine Graykin. David Hartwell started off by saying the question has been asked since at least 1980 at cons. When it comes to straight numbers, the answer is no, according to him. SF is in steady state, neither shrinking nor expanding. Fantasy has expanded both in subgenres and absolute number, so it might seem otherwise, but SF is still healthy. Questions of accessibility were addressed, and Brett Cox said that it wasn't as easy to just pick up a good SF book and get it. Hartwell gave a counterexample of Needle by Hal Clement, which is good old-fashioned SF and just as hard to get. For short fiction, Hartwell said that their Year's Best Science Fiction outsells the comparable fantasy volume at least 5 to 1 (which is why YBF9 is POD). Fantasy readers want longer works. Twenty years ago, you could write stand-alone fantasy. Ten years ago, you could write a trilogy for fantasy. Today, readers want open-ended series and big books (which still doesn't mean you should necessarily write a doorstop as a debut novel). I found that a tad depressing, since Sundered Sword is going to be stand-alone fantasy, but I can't worry about the market now. I just have to write the best work I can.

The last talk I went to on Saturday was Jordin Kare's "Beaming Power and Space Elevators," on winning NASA's Centennial Challenge with Otis the Climber. Awesome pictures and video. Also amusing, as his wife (the aforementioned Mary Kay Kare) chipped in with comments about "horror."

After that, [livejournal.com profile] bonniers showed me a bit around the waterfront, walking down Summer Street, over to the Rose Fitzgerald Kennedy Greenway, then around Fan Pier before heading back to the Westin. It was a bit more than my ankle was truly up for, but I kept saying, "Oh, no, I can keep going." Boston has some truly lovely views, and walking around made me feel closer to Pepper for a bit.
eimarra: (Default)
It took me longer than expected to get to [livejournal.com profile] bonniers' place (2 tires low on air that I had to stop to fill), but we managed to get to Boskone in time for panels at 6.

First off, I went to "The ethics of first contact" with Walter H. Hunt, Allen Steele, and Vernor Vinge. Topics included historical contacts (Mayflower by Nathaniel Philbrick and Shogun by James Clavell recommended reading), ability to communicate, whether we should be hiding, and who has written protocols for first contact (Sierra Club, United Nations, and -- purportedly -- the U.S. military). I plan to look for Poul Anderson's High Crusade to read.

After that, I went to a panel on FTL with Geoffrey Landis, Chuck Gannon, Ian Tregillis, and Jordin Kare. Short version: it can't be done.

"Biblical themes and religion in genre fiction" was a very enjoyable panel with Dani Kollin (son of a rabbi), Margaret Ronald (lapsed heathen -- her description), Jeffrey Carver (moderator), Steven Popkes (practicing heathen), and Walter Hunt (raised Protestant). Guest starring giant metal robots. Discussed reading foundational books, the nature of faith, whether gods should appear in stories.

After that they demonstrated that this was a science fiction con by using Skype to create a joint panel with Capricon in Chicago -- Charlie Stross & Alastair Reynolds in Boston, and Gene Wolfe & Robert Sawyer in Chicago discussing "the way the future was." There was some grumbling about the small portion of SF being written compared to paranormal romance (which lumped in urban fantasy, I think, in the speakers' eyes) -- note, though, that at a Saturday panel, David Hartwell said SF has been steady-state since the mid-80s; it has not declined. Charlie Stross made some comments about what has been a crime hasn't been constant through time, and there's no reason to think it will in the future. Arthur Clarke was quoted: data is not knowledge, and knowledge is not wisdom.

The last Friday event I went to was the discussion of steampunk with Michael Swanwick, Paul di Filippo, Everett Soares, and Lev Grossman. The point was made that it is a large amorphous genre and it encompasses fashion and music, not just written works or movies. The panelists felt steampunk focuses on London and the Empire and mostly encompasses Caucasians, both in its depictions and in those who have made it a lifestyle, though this may be changing.

And that was Friday. Short version: I'm having fun, my brain is full, and I'm pondering changes to works in progress as well as new ideas. Oh, and I'm getting a huge reading list! Sorry this took so long to get up, but I was having trouble maintaining a connection to get the LJ app on my iPod Touch to post!

September 2017

S M T W T F S
      12
3 4 5 6789
101112 13 14 1516
171819 20 21 2223
24252627282930

Syndicate

RSS Atom

Most Popular Tags

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Page generated Jul. 19th, 2025 05:53 pm
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios